Saturday, March 29, 2008

AFGHANISTAN


Afghanistan is the poorest country in the world outside of sub-Saharian countries of the African continent and responsible for 40% of world's opium production. That country has been a center of terrorism of global reach whose history has begun such a long time before the aftermaths of 9/11 and USA invasion. It is deeply related to the expansion of the English and Russian Empires over the two last centuries. Treaties between Kabul, London and Russia drew the frontier lines of Afghanistan with another countries and also the Pashtun tribal areas well-known as the Durand Line with Pakistan.

Since the beginning of the twentieth century many factors have increased tensions in that area of the globe, such as recognition of Afghanistan’s full sovereignty (1919) and the independence and partition of India (1940) and the Cold War up rising. As a consequence, Afghanistan denies the Durand Line, an international border which separates it from Pakistan.

In 1978 on the top of the Cold War, Russia supported a military coup by communist officers in Afghanistan. This fact made the border between Afghanistan (part of the Moscow, Kabul and New Delhi axis) and Pakistan a new battle field to wage that war and its main potencies quickly started to offer military and financial aid for each side: communist military officers and mujahideen insurgency, which was used to receiving billions of dollars from Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and United States. It has been claimed rightly that the conflict of 1978 laid the foundations of regional e global jihad.

The two great potencies pull out of the conflict after the Geneva Accords of 1988 which stated that Soviet Union withdrew its troops and stop aiding to military communist government of Kabul while the United States committed itself to end its military assistance to the mujahideen insurgency in which Taliban and Osama bin Laden played an important role. However, Pakistan and USA did not keep its promise and the failure of Afghanistan was the only result. Then, the mujahideen insurgency was strengthen as a consequence of the dissolution of Soviet Union and the lack of support to Pashtun branches in Afghanistan.

After 1998 Afghanistan was under Taliban and Pashtun groups’ control and it has been struggling a tough campaign against non-Pashtun groups, especially when Osama bin Laden was expelled from Sudan in 1996 and find asylum in Afghanistan. Since then, the game turned over against USA interest and its former allies became a dangerous threaten to the western civilization. Clinton administration finally realized what a enemy the American army had created when two USA embassies in Africa were blown up by al-Qaeda terrorist bombings.

Nowadays, leaders of Northern Alliance and its followers fight against Taliban militia formed by Pashtun and the government of Afghanistan has not succeeded to put an end in it, especially because of corruption inside the police groups – themselves frequently responsible for kidnappers and robbers – which are involved in receiving bribes from traffickers of opium. Afghanistan’s economy is strongly based on illegal poppy crops and its growers support Taliban economically in exchange of protection. According to UN Office on Drugs and Crime opium poppy production has been increasing each year, instead of American eradication policy in Afghanistan. Beyond of this fact, it has been claimed that Taliban is also supported by Pakistan intelligence (ISI) to fight against Northern Alliance.

The only solution for Afghanistan collapse seems to be related with some of main points, such as recognition of Durand Line, stopping military assistance and international aid to Pakistan, detering narcotics cultivation and replacing opium production by other legal activity and also creating livelihood for Afghan people. Otherwise, the 29,000 US troops will not ever be enough as the 26 nations of NATO as well.

Sunday, February 24, 2008

Cuba with and without Castro



Fidel Castro’s resignation on February, 19, 2008, makes an old question come up to us once more: was he good for Cuba? Backing to 1959, when Mr. Castro and Che Guevara overthrow Fulgencio Batista from power the leaders of Cuban Revolution had made a promise of holding free elections and restoring democracy to the island. Years have gone since then and Cubans are still waiting for that political freedom.

Since July 2006, Mr. Castro has stepped down and has empowered his younger brother Raul – who is blamed by international press of alcoholism and lack of charisma – as a President of the Communist Party and the head of the Council of State. By that time Castro had undergone to an emergency surgery for a terminal intestinal cancer or diverticulitis with complications and last Tuesday (Fev, 19, 2008) he finally resigned by stating an official announcement on the Granma that he would not accept to be indicated by National Assembly to occupy the position of President and Commander in chief.

Washington and the large community of Cubans living in Florida and New Jersey still seem to wait for an opportunity to open Cuba to the world after Fidel’s resignation. However, nothing seems to change at all. The daily life on the island is exactly the same that used to be before that such a long-hoped announcement. Policymakers have different perspective of the following event. Some of them believe that it finally give to US the right opportunity of restoring democracy and an open society in Cuba. Others think the opposite by stating that communism in Cuba will outlive after Fidel, specially because he has prepared his staff for this moment for many years and the Cuba’s system seems to be ready for a very smooth and stable transition.

It has been told that Cuba’s system will not survive at all after Mr. Castro’s death, firstly, because his successor has a more opened agenda to modernize of the country inspired by Chinese model of development; secondly, because the long-oppressed population of Cuba is eager for political freedom and market democracy. But some main factors might be taken in consideration before saying so that easily: achievements and failures of Castro’s regime. Cuban’s life-expectancy raised up from 60 in the 50’s to 80 years in 80’s, literacy rate raised to 90 percent. Public vaccinations programs eradicated many diseases such as polio, diphtheria, tetanus, meningitis, and measles. Castro’s regime has also delivered full employment, free education and universal health care system. But at the same time, Cubans are deeply frustrated by their just making ends of meet’s way of life, although they have a skilled work force, and bad conditions of housing, public transportation, clothing . On the other hand, adversaries of Castro’s regime are always calling attention of the public opinion outside and on the island to his human rights violations such as 5,700 roughly executions, 1,200 extrajudicial murders, and 300 political prisoners, without speaking about 2 million Cuban refugees living abroad.

In the last years the fall of Cuba’s socialism was predicted by its critics at least three times, when US made its economical blockade after the missile’s crisis at the Pigs Bay in the fall of 1962; or when Soviet Union cut off its $4 billion annual subsidy and the economical growth of the island fell down 35% overnight by the end of the Cold War; and, lastly, at the present time by the dawn of the myth, who is still an icon of social justice in many countries of Latin America, including in Brazil. Whatever happens after Castro on that island no one is yet able to predict. But it has been told truly that rule of law, free market, private property, pluralistic elections, respect to religious minorities and sexual freedom, releasing political prisoners, all of those modern and western values and achievements still remain only a whispered desire in Cubans’ hearts and minds.

Monday, February 18, 2008

EAST TIMOR


The Small Asian Island of East Timor seems to have an irrefutable fate: rampage. That resource-rich but still impoverished country has been invaded by Indonesia since 1976, the following year that Portugal pulled out of its territory after almost four hundred years of colonization.

When Asia-countries economic crisis of 1999 arised and reached Indonesia its occupation in East Timor became much more difficult, at first because the fourth biggest populated country in the world had no longer support of international communities and financial international institutions as World Bank or FMI; secondly, because at that time many human rights activists groups were struggling to push Indonesia military troops out of East Timor by spreadig out worldwide reports on human rights violations there.

However, they had many concerns in 1999 about Indonesia's pulling out of East Timor and its full independence before its government was ready to keep up peace. Finally, when it took place an UN-sponsored vote in August, 30, 1999, beginning waves of violence sparked through the country.

East Timor has been divided by anti-independence militia groups - for whom Indonesia military still provides clandestine guns - on one side and the government on the other side. Many of militia troops are made by former soldiers who came from the army, including Alfredo Reinado. They claim having been sacked by the army just because they came from the western part of the island which was colonized by Dutch and already was part of Indonesian territory.

East Timorese have been watched uncountable acts of terrorism against their people taking place everywhere in the country. Rebels are hidden in the mountains and protected by local people and they have been planning many attacks into the government. Few days ago, there were two attempts of murdering the East Timor's President Jose Ramos-Horta, who underwent to an emergency surgery after the attack and still has his life at risk, and the Prime Minister Xanana Gusmao who escaped without injuries and claims that the attacks were carried out by Reinado and his followers.

More than 200,000 people have died since 1976 in East Timor. International organizations must help East Timor before nothing else is left.

Wednesday, February 21, 2007

Cultural Literacy


I actually did not have formal learning in cultural literacy, but I received the right influence from some members of my family and from close relationships. I was twelve years old when I read at the first time one famous magazine in Brazil called “veja” which means “see” in English. After that I would read the book review section and some reports about music every single weekend. The editor of that section would write a list of the best-sellers and of the best long-players – LPs as we have called them at that time. As Brazilian people had lived for a long time under a dictatorship, they were fed up with cultural censorship and they were avid of knowledge such as music, painting, literature and Culture. So was I. Although I was born in the plenty light of the military tyranny, I was a teenager who liked to read a lot and listen to “different” kind of music. I have found out the revolutionary musical rhythm of “bossa-nova” made in Brazil and exported to the rest of the world by Tom Jobim and Joao Gilberto. And simultaneously I had also my first contact with the “Tropicalia” – a cultural movement in Brazil – listening to the music of Caetano Veloso. In his long-players I found out the poetry of Haroldo de Campos and of other Brazilian poets who leaded me forward the worldly literature and then to the philosophy. As I was growing, by suggestion of my uncles, I used to enjoy my time reading Russian, French and American literature, including the main books of Fiodor Dostoievski, Victor Hugo, and Ernest Hemingway. When I got into at high-school it was the turn of philosophy and I started to read Germany Philosophy such as Nietzsche and Schopenhauer. The music of Richard Wagner came to me automatically after then. At that time I made important and cultured friends who helped me increasing my level of knowledge about music, painting and literature, especially because one of them was a pianist and the other was a painter. I was seventeen and had a lot of spare time to read books, visit museums, go to the theater and see all festivals of cinema. I am not sure if it is the best way to acquire Culture literacy, but it was how I did – by sharing experiences.

Saturday, February 10, 2007

Peace and War


The Iraq War 2003 has been considered one of the most controversial American wars since the World War II. The Bush Administration told the American people that they had to remove Saddam Hussein because he would have Weapons of Mass Destruction and was developing a program of enriching uranium, supposedly to create a nuclear bomb. As soon as it wasn’t found any WMD in Iraq, that administration begun to change their rhetoric from principle of preventive war to speech of democracy in Middle East. As Condoleeza Rice said once at the American University in Cairo: “Now we are taking a different course. We are supporting the democratic aspirations of all people” (Time, Feb.12,2007). However, there are some and powerful voices in United States that disagree with Bush and Rice’s foreign policy, such as Senator Chuck Hagel has affirmed: “American cannot impose a democracy on any nation – regardless of our noble purpose. You cannot have a foreign policy based on divine mission. We tried that in the Middle Ages, that’s what the Crusades were about.” (The National Interest, Jan/Feb. 2007, p. 5). Lee Kuan Yew, Prime Minister of Singapore, in the academic journal "Foreign Affairs" (January/February 2007) states: "A free and fair election, moreover, is not the best first step toward democracy in a country that has no history or tradition of self-government." So, it is the relationship between democracy and foreign policy in US that consists the subject of our project research.

Wednesday, February 7, 2007

Male and Female


Lecture: Male and Female Communicative Patterns.

Professor Scott has presented at Concordia University a lecture of a research made by Deborah Tannen. She wrote a book about differences in men and women’s communicative patterns. She supports her thesis using a linguistic-pragmatic theory. It was explained in the lecture that pragmatic consist in part of linguistic which study the practical use of language. I will give an example by myself, if an owner of a restaurant located in front of a beach put a sign stating: “It’s forbidden enter using bikini”; it means that it is not allowed to come in without being dressed up. But, if the same sign is put in entrance of one nudist beach, it will mean something completely different. This is an excellent example of use pragmatic of language, i.e. when the same sentence have opposite meanings. It was also explained by Professor Scott based in Deborah Tannen’s research that female usually tell each other stories about how fights destroy their relationships, while male speak about troubles in general topics. Both of them talk about other people, importance of friendship and put down other people, but men do that in very general way, while women talk in a specific way, such as when they talk about hair-style or clothes other women are wearing. In that lecture, it was shown study on patterns communication between male and female in debates on TV show as well. In this kind of TV show people are invited to talk about scientific, cultural, social or political topics, specially well-known, celebrities, and experts. In that kind of show when male experts are talking about their field of studies women always support them. But the opposite has never happened, even if the women had extrinsic values and highest level of knowledge. It has never been easy for women negotiate their status, explain Professor Scott. In workplace environment, for instance, women are always making suggestion, alliances and negotiations, but men usually just state their ideas in a very positive and direct way. In conclusion, it is recognized that exist certain patterns of communications separated by genders, but it doesn’t mean that all women or men speak exactly at the same way. [Comments: the lecture was really fruitful because Professor Scott gave us practical examples of using communicative patterns in men and women conversations and it was presented in a simple and clear way].

Monday, February 5, 2007

In the Skin of a Lion - Ondaatje's Novel


Michael Ondaatje was born in Sri Lanka and came to Canada as immigrant, exactly like many of his characters did. Ondaatje’s novel “In the Skin of a Lion” introduces people who were forgotten by official history: thieves, actresses, bridge builders, immigrants and anarchists, lonely voices fighting against the power of money and of oppression. He gave us one kind of story which travels “languorously like messages in a bottle”.

In 1923 the 21 years-old Patrick arrives in Toronto. He looks at the huge arches of Union Station – the heart of the city – which seems a magical portal that will turn the meaning of his life. “He was an immigrant to the city”, even though he was born in Canada. He is entering into the jungle in a skin of a lion; he is willing to fight for his survival. “Now, in the city, he was new even to himself, the past locked away” .

Ambroise Small, the millionaire, disappeared in 1919. He met the radio actress Clara Dickens who became his lover. At that time, Patrick became a searcher, because he was also interested in how to find Abroise Small since his family offered $80,000 as reward for his whereabouts.

Patrick meets Clara Dickens in Paris (Ontario), “the rare lover, the ‘perfect woman’”. She is a woman who has sexual liberty in the beginning of the 20th century. Patrick can’t stand the idea that she loves another man. He was a boy coming from the country while she already was an experienced radio actress and thirsty of freedom.

1930 is the year of the economic depression. Patrick felt ashamed of himself, he was just working in the lake tunnel and nobody knows anything about him. When he was going back home he stopped at a building where people moved in noise. There were a party and a political meeting. And there he will met Alice Gull at the second time. She tells him some political ideas about anarchism and about how to destroy the power of rich people.

Patrick is looking for the meaning of his life in other lives, trying to forget his past or build his future searching the past of other people. He named his enemies and chose his target with resolution: Muskoka hotel, the riches’ paradise.

Definitely, the author of “In Skin of a Lion” is among those who can bring back the order from the chaos and light minds and hearts as if he was reorganizing the several pieces of a puzzle, the strange and magical puzzle of life. It’s a powerful story, plenty of love and compassion. And how said its author “all else is labour and darkness. (…) An unfinished world.”